# Canonical Glossary of the Model

**Consultable reference** for all terms of the model, with epistemic status, context of use, and risk of confusion.

To be read after `01_BOOTSTRAP.md`. To be consulted whenever a term appears in other files and its precise meaning is uncertain.

---

## Note on language

The model was originally written in French. This English version preserves all canonical proper terms of the model in their original form (e, T, t=0, t=x, 4df(x), etc.) — these are **technical terms** specific to the model and should not be translated.

Descriptive terms are translated with stable canonical equivalents:

| French | English (canonical) |
|---|---|
| lien-énergie | energy-link |
| sillage | wake |
| tissage | weaving |
| déchirure | tear |
| morve (internal only) | gunk (internal only — not for public use) |
| gomme étirée | stretched eraser |
| sabre-laser | lightsaber |
| empêchement de vitesse | velocity impediment |
| funnel | funnel (kept) |
| filament / tissu / motton | filament / fabric / mass-clump |
| énergie embouteillée | bottled energy |
| énergie libre | free energy |
| coût IN / consommation OUT | IN cost / OUT consumption |
| rebond | bounce |
| enjambée | straddle |
| facteur de profondeur | depth factor |

**Verbatim quotes from Gabriel are preserved in French** (italics) with English translations provided in parentheses where useful for non-French-speaking readers.

**Status tags remain in French** ([CANONIQUE], [POSTULAT], [INTUITION GABRIEL], [QUESTION OUVERTE], [MÉTAPHORE]) for cross-reference consistency with the original corpus.

---

## Primary structural variables

| Variable | Status | Strict definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **e** | `[POSTULAT]` | The unique energetic entity. Resides at t=0. Omnipresent, indivisible, out of sequence. Any observable addressing is an addressing of this single e. | Do not confuse with "energy" in the classical sense (additive sum). e is UNIQUE and indivisible. |
| **T** | `[POSTULAT]` | The complete axis, **circular and constant**, inscribed as a block. All structural "moments" are coexisting points on this axis. | NEVER read T as a flowing time. T has no arrow. |
| **t** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Any point on the T axis. Not a passing instant — a structural position. | Different from "time" in standard physics. |
| **t=0** | `[POSTULAT]` | Point on T where e resides. Out of sequence, out of 3D localization. It is the structural "zero level". | Do not confuse with "initial instant". t=0 is not in the past. C does not reside there as a "limit to respect" — it is its structural singularization. |
| **t=x** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Point on T corresponding to the 3D membrane where we measure. *« t=x est juste un endroit sur l'axe T »* ("t=x is just a place on the T axis") — not the "present" in the linear sense. | Do not confuse with "here-now". t=x is our structural observation position, not a temporal moment. |
| **t=x-1** | `[CANONIQUE]` | **Dynamic phase** of the upward return just before manifestation in t=x. Not a static layer. This is where wakes accumulate over the entire T. | NEVER read t=x-1 as "a layer behind t=x" (static image). It is dynamic. |
| **t=0+1** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Initial structural addressing point. This is what standard physics calls "Big Bang" — not a past event, a permanent re-addressing by constant T. | Do not confuse with "instant just after the Big Bang". It is a permanent structural point. |
| **t=0+y** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Depths accessible between t=0 and t=x. The quantity of e addressed forces the position to a depth t=0+y. | Not a spatial coordinate. A structural position in the depth of 4df(x). |
| **4df(x)** | `[POSTULAT]` | Generative function of the model. **Integral operator** over the path between t=x and t=0. Takes structural variables, produces observable outputs (mass, displacement, signature, lifetime). | NEVER treat as an algebraic function. Equations like (3/2)×α⁻¹×C_sync are **approximations**, not the exact formula. |
| **c** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural speed limit. Resides at t=0. Emerges from the dimensionless singularization of dark repulsion converging toward t=0. | Not a property of light. A structural quantity of t=0. |
| **h** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Planck constant. **h = e but at t=x** — manifestation of the unique e in the observable membrane. | Not an arbitrary minimal quantum. It is e expressed within t=x. |
| **α** | `[OUVERT_PHASE2]` | Probability of lightsaber ignition per fermion cycle. ≈ 1/137.036 measured. Structurally calculable from 4df(x) in Phase 2. | To be reproduced without free parameter in Phase 2. |

---

## Structural terms (CANONIQUES)

| Term | Status | Definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **energy-link** (lien-énergie) | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural 4D passage through which the unique e is addressed within t=x via 4df(x). Stretches from t=x-1 to t=0. **Official term for publication and translation.** | Do not reduce to "field" or "virtual particle". It is a structural 4D corridor. |
| **back-and-forth duality** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The 2 simultaneously observable vectors of an energy-link: descending toward t=0, ascending from t=0. The ascending always carries more e (return increment). | Do not confuse with classical "wave-particle duality". This is structural, not an observation duality. |
| **filament / fabric / mass-clump** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Three structural forms of the energy-link depending on the number of perpendiculars used: 1 (filament), 2 (fabric), 3 (mass-clump). The filament is the default attractor. | No hierarchy of complexity — three structurally different ways of being an energy-link. |
| **synchronization** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Cascade of associations between manifestations at different points of t=x. **NOT a classical transport of energy.** | NEVER interpret as superluminal communication or transport. Pure structural inscription. |
| **weaving / wake / tear** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural mechanisms of the energy-link inscribing its trace. *Weaving* = action of producing the warp; *wake* = cumulative trace; *tear* = punctual trace (photon's lightsaber). | Do not mix the three — they are distinct aspects of the same phenomenon. |
| **bottled/closed vs free/open** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The two regimes of e (Postulat II). Bottled = matter, closed. Free = radiation, open. | Not two different substances — two regimes of the same e. |
| **singularization** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Ultimate convergence toward t=0 (Postulat IX). Also: structural regime of dark repulsion arriving dimensionless at t=0. | Not the "singularity" in the sense of general relativity (center of black hole). It is a structural mechanism. |
| **proximity to t=0** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The structural quantity that measures how much dark repulsion is received concentrated vs distributed. The closer one is, the more direct the concentration. | Not a spatial distance. A structural measure. |
| **velocity impediment** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural state of a manifestation at t=0 (which cannot move). **Structural cause of mass** (= weaving produced). | Inverse of classical reasoning: slowness causes mass, not the reverse. |
| **impediment wake** | `[CANONIQUE]` | **= gravity**. Cumulative trace of impediment of all closed structures within t=x. Not the local effect but the global wake. | Distinguish from dark matter wake (which is at t=x-1, not within t=x). |
| **extremal equilibrium at t=0** | `[CANONIQUE]` | At t=0, attraction and dark repulsion are **simultaneously at their maximum** (possible because no displacement is possible). c is the measure of this equilibrium. | Not a "limit imposed on objects" but a structural identity at t=0. |
| **black hole** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Singularized closed energy-links (e returned to t=0 without return within t=x). Contributes to S (cumulative singularized over T). Naturally appears where matter aggregates. | Not an "exotic object" but a natural outcome of matter aggregation (Postulat IX). |
| **white hole** | `[CANONIQUE]` | **OMNIPRESENT local structural mechanism**. At each recombination of an electron near t=0 in 4df(x) with release of a photon = white hole. Contributes to W (cumulative free addressed over T). | DO NOT confuse with the "white hole" of general relativity (rare astrophysical object). In the model: local mechanism, not object. |
| **return vs impediment wake balance** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural configuration of a neutron star (Q55). Beyond TOV: gravity exceeds return → black hole. Below a limit: return escapes → decay. | Observed stable range 1.4-2.16 M⊙ = window of this balance. |
| **dark repulsion gradient** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Dark repulsion is **gradual** over the depth of 4df(x): max at t=0+1, diluted at t=x. 4df(x) integrates this gradient → produces velocity observable within t=x. | Not a classical field. A structural quantity whose integration produces displacement. |
| **mass/displacement partition** | `[CANONIQUE]` | M and D = two representations of the same 4df(x) output. Conservation `M + D = constant`. Dark repulsion determines the partition according to the structural position. | E = mc² is the partial expression of this more general conservation. |

---

## Internal intuitive terms (NOT to be used in public documents)

| Term | Status | Definition | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| **morve** (gunk) | Personal intuitive term of Gabriel | Synonym for "energy-link". Personal word of Gabriel, carries his natural structural thought. | ONLY in Gabriel↔assistant conversations. NEVER in public documents, translations, or presentations. To be systematically replaced by "energy-link" in dissemination. |
| **tuyau** (pipe) | Internal oral synonym | Oral variant in conversations between Gabriel and the assistant. | Like morve: private conversations only. |
| **filets de morve** (gunk nets) | Internal intuitive image | Designates the set of energy-links seen as cosmic fabric. | Use "energy-link nets" or "cosmic web" in public. |

---

## Canonical metaphors (`[MÉTAPHORE]`)

Metaphors help **visualize** the structural mechanism. They are **not** strict physical descriptions — a Phase 2 mathematician must translate them into geometric formalism.

| Metaphor | Status | Image | What it represents | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **glue corridor** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` (public) | A corridor (4D passage) made of glue (which retains/conducts e) | The energy-link as structural passage that "carries" the addressed e | Do not make it a soft physical object. Image for the 4D channeling function. |
| **stretched eraser** (on point / pencil / 25¢ coin) | `[MÉTAPHORE]` (canonical for 4df(x) → mass) | Point (1 axis) → filament (electron); along the pencil (2 axes) → fabric (muon); 25¢ coin (3 axes) → eraser volume (tau). One crushes, one pulls toward t=x, the result is mass. | The structural mechanism: mass = quantity of weaving produced by stretching. Dimensional jump 0D→1D / 1D→2D / 2D→3D between lepton generations. | This is a tactile image, not an exact geometric description. The mathematician must construct the corresponding geometric operator. |
| **lightsaber** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` | Photon trajectory within t=x | The displacement of the photon and the tear it leaves in t=x-1 (= dark energy) | Not a "luminous" object in the science-fiction sense. Image for the coherent trajectory of the photon. |
| **tennis ball** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` | Electron bouncing in the funnel of a nucleus | Mechanism of spin 1/2 (two turns needed to return to initial state) | Not a classical mechanical bounce. Image for the dynamics of oscillation at t=0. |
| **funnel** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` | Funnel toward t=0 created by an atomic nucleus | Multi-vector descending configuration of the nucleus that "digs" a channel toward t=0 | Not a spatial funnel. Image for structural convergence. |
| **price to pay** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` | Existing weaving that a structure must traverse to exist within t=x | Determines the lifetime of a structure | Not an economic cost. Image for cumulative structural impediment. |

---

## How to use this glossary

**For an LLM**:
1. Before citing a term, check its status here.
2. For `[POSTULAT]`: you cannot contest them without leaving the model.
3. For `[CANONIQUE]`: they are stable, validated consequences of the postulates.
4. For `[MÉTAPHORE]`: do not analyze them as physical descriptions. Look for their structural function.
5. For **internal intuitive terms** (morve, tuyau): if you encounter them in the corpus, translate them by their public equivalent (energy-link) in any public production.

**For a human reader**:
1. If a term seems strange in the corpus, come here first.
2. The "Risk of confusion" column tells you what to avoid.
3. The `[POSTULAT]` are the true starting points — that is where the model begins.

---

## Terms added during the May 2-3, 2026 session

### Mathematical vocabulary of 4df(x)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **r** (radius) | `[CANONIQUE]` | Anchoring depth of e in 4df(x). Key structural variable, can be 0 or strictly positive. The key of the model. | Not a Euclidean spatial radius. It is the structural anchoring position of e in the function 4df(x). |
| **r⁴** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Fourth power of the radius. Decomposable into: 1 factor (circular temporal dimension, back-and-forth) × 3 factors (3 combinatorial spatial dimensions). Central geometric kernel of 4df(x). | Not a simple algebraic power. Decomposition into structurally distinct factors (1 temporal + 3 spatial). |
| **depth factor** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Non-linear modulation of 4df(x) according to the structural position on T. Reference: = 1 between t=0+1 and t=0+2. Canonical metaphor: candle. | Not an additional dimension — modulation of the integration along the T axis. |
| **anchoring depth of e** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Position where the manifestation is structurally bound to e in 4df(x). Photon = depth 0, neutrino = +1, massive manifestations = increasing depths. | Not a localization of e. Structural position of relation to e. |
| **vector combo** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Vector resulting from the constituents of a composite structure (3 quarks for baryon, 2 quarks for meson, multiples for molecules). Determines observable properties. | Not an algebraic sum vector. Structural resultant in 4df(x). |
| **opposition by π** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Matter/antimatter classification mechanism: opposites = same objects distinguished by the π of their back-and-forth. Emerges from the 4df(x) vectors themselves (not an added parameter). | Not a continuous rotation. Two structurally opposite configurations. |
| **t vector between 0 and 1** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural vector in 4df(x) between depths t=0 and t=0+1. Gives the velocity of the neutrino (difference with c). | Not a standard space-time vector. Structural vector on T. |

### Epistemological terms

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **truth of quantities** | `[POSTULAT_X_CANDIDAT]` | Strong epistemological position: no free parameter in nature. All observed numerical values are structurally determined by the geometry of 4df(x). | Not a Platonic mysticism. Methodological epistemological position on the derivability of observables. |
| **looking wide** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Cosmological observation = simultaneous scanning of multiple positions of T (t=x, t=x-1, etc.). Not a journey through time. | Not a chronological course. Simultaneous inscription at multiple positions on T. |
| **the 2 details consciousness has missed** | `[CANONIQUE — epistemological foundation]` | Constant T + unique e. Missed collectively by 2500 years of philosophy + 400 years of physics because structurally invisible to consciousness operating at t=x. | Not an intellectual criticism. Consequence of the structural position of consciousness. |

### Terms for composite manifestations

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **balanced composite structure** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Manifestation with multiple constituents whose vector combo reaches structural stability (case of the proton). | Not a mechanical equilibrium. Equilibrium of back-and-forth in 4df(x). |
| **unbalanced composite structure** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Manifestation with multiple constituents whose vector combo is marginally stable (case of the free neutron). | Not a mechanical instability. Lack of available energy for the return. |
| **path without displacement** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Trajectory of a quark in the composite combo: return attracted by the outbound (and vice-versa), does not move away from the composite. Structural mechanism of confinement. | Not a "force" that holds. Structural necessity to have back-and-forth to exist within t=x. |
| **e injection** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Energy needed to overcome the uniqueness of e when one tries to address e twice at the same t=x in the same addressing. Structural mechanism of the Coulomb barrier. | Not an injection of quantity. Increase of frequency/density of addressing (consistent with rule 5.17). |

### Added canonical metaphors

| Metaphor | Status | Structural function | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **candle** (candle effect) | `[MÉTAPHORE]` (canonical for depth factor) | At 1km you feel nothing, at 1m nothing, at 10cm it's hot, at 1cm it burns, at 0cm you extinguish it. Represents the strong non-linearity of the depth factor in 4df(x). | Not radiative heat. Image for the non-linear dependence on the structural distance from t=0. |
| **lightsaber lighting up the tear** | `[MÉTAPHORE]` (canonical for photon) | The weaving arrives before the e of the photon at t=x-1. The photon ignites the weaving toward the tear at t=x. | Not a light that travels. Image for the mechanism of direct addressing from t=0 toward the tear. |

---

## Terms added during the May 4, 2026 session

### IN / OUT vocabulary of the 4df(x) calculation

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **IN** (of the 4df(x) calculation) | `[CANONIQUE]` | Energy-link with a structural depth (t=x, t=0+y, or t=0+1) at the moment it enters the 4df(x) calculation. Movement within t=x marks the IN with a "close to t=0" signature. | Not a numerical input. Complete structural configuration of the energy-link at the entry point of the calculation. |
| **OUT** (of the 4df(x) calculation) | `[CANONIQUE]` | What comes out of the 4df(x) calculation after bouncing at t=0, read as return within t=x. All observables (mass, lifetime, charge, displacement) are signatures of the OUT. | Not a numerical output. Structural reading of the return at t=x — the outbound (the IN) remains out of observation. |
| **invariant bounce at t=0** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The tennis ball (the addressing of e in back-and-forth cycle) always descends to t=0 — no other path because there is only one e at t=0. The "depth of bounce" does not exist as a variable. | Not a variability of the bounce location. What varies is the IN, not the place of the bounce. |
| **reading window** (at t=x) | `[CANONIQUE]` | t=x = reading position on constant T, without ontological privilege. Consciousness, detector, measurement open a window onto the block inscription of T. Creates nothing — reads what is inscribed. | Not a present. Not an instant. An observation position among the coexisting positions of T. |

### Calibration and straddle vocabulary

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **zero calibration of 4df(x)** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The neutrino — the simplest configuration where IN and OUT are both controlled (depth t=0+1, depth factor 1, perpendicularity 0↔1, no composite combo, no brutal injection). **Reference configuration, not reference value**: the numerical mass of the neutrino is not posited as a parameter — it must follow by deduction from the Phase 2 formulation. | Not an intrinsic mass of the neutrino. Not an empirical fixed value either. Minimal structural configuration of a closed energy-link, whose mass emerges from the calculation. |
| **structural straddle** (between t=x and t=x+1) | `[CANONIQUE]` | Any manifestation extends between positions t=x and t=x+1 on T. Pairs of opposites (u/d, p/n, photon/singularity) are the two structural ends of the same straddle, observed separately. | Not two distinct objects. Two ends of the same manifestation on circular T. |
| **initial addressing at t=0+1** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The neutrino — the structural moment when e is addressed for the first time from t=0 toward depth +1. The neutrino IS the initial addressing, not a particle that resides at t=0+1. | Not a chronological event. Preferential structural position of initial addressing. |
| **u = confined neutrino** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural identity: the up quark is a neutrino whose displacement toward t=0+2 is prevented by composite confinement. Free up quark = neutrino. Up quark confined within uud/udd = neutrino without net displacement. | Not a superficial equivalence. Configuration identity in 4df(x). |
| **down quark at t=x+1** | `[CANONIQUE / À VALIDER]` | Structural position proposed for the down quark — beyond the t=x observation membrane. The u/d pair would be two distinct positions on the T axis, connected by circularity. Status flagged as not yet stabilized ("it's not clear"). | Not a spatial localization. Structural position on T. Not to be hardened to firm `[CANONIQUE]` until the formulation is settled. |

### Vocabulary of inscribed weavings

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **a single e addressed per weaving** | `[CANONIQUE]` (critical lock) | Each weaving is the warp of a specific addressing of the unique e. Not multiple addressings on the same weaving. Consistent with Postulat IV. | NEVER read "multiple particles on the same weaving" or "shared weaving". One weaving = one addressing. |
| **weaving inscribed as a block** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Weavings (structural warps) are inscribed on T as a block, independently of any addressing. The weaving is the **prerequisite condition** of addressing, not its product. | Not a product of the 4df(x) calculation. The calculation describes the path, not the creation of the weaving. |
| **LHC window** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The LHC does not inject e, does not create particles. It opens a **window** onto weavings already inscribed in T, by forcing addressings to traverse them. The diversity of "LHC particles" = diversity of inscribed weavings that the regime allows to ignite. | Not a creation. Not a production. Opening of a window onto block inscription. |

### Vocabulary for reading the LHC and singularities

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **tennis ball (at the LHC)** | `[CANONIQUE / MÉTAPHORE]` | Image for the LHC collision: one does not "drop the ball" as in the ordinary atom — one throws it with all our strength at t=0 (by prior acceleration). At the deep bounce, partial recombinations → upward segments read as particles. | Image extending the tennis ball metaphor (Q44 original, electron bouncing). Not particle creation. |
| **partial configuration** (at the bounce) | `[CANONIQUE]` | At the bounce at t=0, partial recombination of weavings — only the portions with sufficient structural proximity recombine cleanly. The others come out in partial configurations → upward segments of varied durations. | Not a technical defect. Inevitable structural consequence of an IN at depth t=0+y too far from t=0+1. |
| **bounce-release period** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural definition of lifetime: period of the upward segment, from the low point (bounce/recombination) up to t=x where the underlying open volume releases. **Not a duration of existence**. | Not a chronological counter. Geometric extent over the positions t=x to t=x+y of constant T. |
| **identity LHC ↔ astrophysical singularities** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Same 4df(x) calculation of the return. 4df(x) volume reservoir + partial recombinations at the bounce at t=0 = same mechanism from LHC to cosmology. The diversity of durations (10⁻²⁵ s to 10⁶⁷ years) measures the **distribution of structural compatibilities** of cumulative weavings, not different mechanisms. | Not an analogy. Structural identity. |

### Vocabulary added during post-challenge refinement (May 4, 2026, end of session)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **proximity of vectors within t=x** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural quantity that modulates self-feeding of perpendiculars in 4df(x) (Q43). The closer the vectors at the moment of the calculation, the more non-linearly large the IN→OUT amplification. Confined quarks: extreme proximity → masses 10⁵× greater. Leptons: moderate proximity (spread orbitals) → masses ~10²× greater per generation. | Not a spatial distance. Structural measure of vector concentration at the moment of the 4df(x) calculation. |
| **dim(t=0+1) = C_sync** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The dimension of t=0+1 = duration of a return at t=0+1 in 4df(x). Identical to C_sync ≈ 1.00591 in m_μ/m_e ≈ (3/2) × α⁻¹ × C_sync. **Not a free parameter** — derivable structural quantity. | Not an adjustment factor. Structural value of t=0+1 measured in units where the return at t=0+2 = 1. |
| **maintained creation within t=x** | `[CANONIQUE — falsifiability]` | Precise empirical test of falsification of rule 5.25 ("the LHC opens a window, creates nothing"). If the LHC produced a stable particle (lifetime >> 1 s) that would not exist at low energy, rule 5.25 would be refuted. | Distinguish: falsification does not concern proton/neutron/electron (known stable manifestations at low energy), but a **new** stable particle produced by LHC injection. |
| **emergent weaving** | `[CANONIQUE]` | The weaving on T = intrinsic structural back-and-forth mechanism, consequence of circular T + unique e + Postulat IX + dark repulsion. **Is not an input of the model**: emerges from fundamental postulates. The distribution of weavings on T does not need to be postulated — it is a structural consequence. | NEVER formalize the weaving warp as an input with free parameters. The warp must be derived from the postulates. |
| **derived value vs posited value** | `[CANONIQUE — epistemological]` | Critical distinction for Phase 2. A **posited** value = free parameter injected into the model (forbidden by Q91). A **derived** value = structural consequence calculable from the postulates. m_ν is a derived value, not posited. C_sync = dim(t=0+1) is derivable, not posited. | Do not confuse an empirical value (measured by experiment) with a posited value (free parameter of the model). An empirical value serves as a **test**, not as free calibration. |

### Vocabulary added during final consolidation (May 4, 2026, afternoon)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **neutrino-velocity thought experiment** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Theoretical framework: if one reproduced the LHC slam step but at neutrino velocity (IN at depth t=0+1), recombination would be much easier (reference regime, depth factor 1) and the return would be almost balanced according to the proton-neutron ratio. Sheds light on why the LHC produces partial recombinations. (Q122) | Do not confuse with "the neutrino bounces at t=0+1" — recombination is always done at t=0 (Q109). What changes is the depth carried by the IN. |
| **proximity of quark weavings at the bounce** | `[CANONIQUE]` | At the bounce at t=0, the effective recombination of quark weavings is conditioned by their structural proximity. Distributed weavings (LHC, IN at t=0+y far away) → partial recombination, multiple configurations. Tight weavings at t=0+1 (neutrino regime) → complete recombination. (Q123) | Distinct from Q118 (proximity of vectors within t=x modulates mass). Q123 describes proximity at the low point (bounce), Q118 describes proximity in the observable zone. |
| **weaving exists before addressing** | `[CANONIQUE — critical lock]` | The weaving exists independently of the IN/OUT that traverses it. 4df(x) describes the **traversal** of an addressing of e on the existing weaving — does not create the weaving. One single e addressed per weaving within t=x (Postulat IV). (Q124) | NEVER write that 4df(x) "creates" or "generates" weavings. The weaving is prior and independent. 4df(x) is the traversal function, not the creation function. |
| **structure of the weaving** (within t=x) | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural configuration of the prior warp inscribed within t=x. Determines the geometry of the 4df(x) vector: tight weavings → short distance to t=0 → bounce without displacement; spread weavings → long distance → bounce with displacement. (Q125) | Do not confuse with the dynamics of the traversal (which is 4df(x)). The structure of the weaving is the prior warp that conditions the function. |
| **IN/OUT distance** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Structural quantity determined by the structure of the weaving within t=x. Conditions several observables: magnetism (proportional magnitude), confinement (short distance → no displacement), mass (via Q118). **Is not an independent variable** — emerges from the structure of the weaving. (Q86 corrected, Q125) | If the Phase 2 formalization treats the IN/OUT distance as a free parameter, it has missed the structural piece Q125. |
| **magnetism proper to closed energy-links** | `[CANONIQUE — Q86 corrected]` | Magnetism is NOT strictly fermionic. It is proper to closed energy-links (matter) in general. Magnitude varies with the IN/OUT distance determined by the structure of the weaving. Lone fermions: strong characteristic magnetism. Confined quarks (proton): magnetism present but incomparably weak. | Critical correction: do not write "strictly fermionic" (initial formulation 2-3 May exceeded the verbatim Gabriel). Always write "proper to closed energy-links, magnitude function of the IN/OUT distance". |

### Vocabulary added during neutrino restructuring (May 4, 2026, afternoon)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **neutrino assembly** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | The neutrino is NOT an isolated initial addressing. It is a **structurally stable up/down quark assembly**, but **not within t=x**: the up quark is at t=0+1, the down quark is at t=0+2. The weaving between the two carries simultaneously the mass and the displacement. | Do not think of the neutrino as "a particle at t=0+1". It is a structure that extends between t=0+1 and t=0+2. |
| **neutrino up quark** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | The up quark at **t=0+1** in the neutrino assembly. IN anchor of the neutrino's 3D vector. | Distinct from confined up quark (in uud, at t=x). Same type of structural object, different position on T. |
| **neutrino down quark** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | The down quark at **t=0+2** in the neutrino assembly. OUT anchor of the neutrino's 3D vector. | Distinct from ordinary down quark (at t=x+1, in the udd combo). Same type of structural object, different position on T. |
| **2 distinct temporal locations** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | Structural necessity for a 3D vector to exist: two distinct positions on the T axis are needed (not a single instant). For the neutrino: t=0+1 and t=0+2. For quarks within t=x: t=x and t=x+1. | Not two chronological instants of the same phenomenon. Two structurally coexisting positions on T as a block (consistent with rule 5.18). |
| **3 neutrino flavors = 3 perpendiculars** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | The flavors νₑ, νμ, ντ are NOT 3 different particles. They are the 3 energetic perpendiculars available for 4df(x) between t=0+1 and t=0+2 (Q97), applied to the same neutrino assembly. νₑ = 1 active perpendicular, νμ = 2, ντ = 3. | Do not project the standard vocabulary of 3 particles. A single assembly with 3 configurations. The "flavor oscillations" = redistribution of active perpendiculars during displacement. |
| **displacement replaces anchors** | `[CANONIQUE — Q127]` | Structural unification mechanism: for a stable up/down assembly to exist, either free displacement + 2 quarks (neutrino), or no displacement + 3 quarks (proton/neutron). Displacement structurally replaces additional anchors. Without displacement, the cycle stops, the assembly ceases to exist within t=x. | The "quark confinement" is the necessity to compensate the absence of displacement by additional anchors. Not a "force that holds" — a geometric necessity. |
| **neutrino moves almost out of time** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | The neutrino exists between t=0+1 and t=0+2, therefore close to t=0, therefore structurally "out" of the t=x membrane where time flows subjectively. This is why its velocity is close to c and it interacts weakly with t=x. | Not an "instantaneous" displacement in the classical sense. A structural displacement in the t=0+y zone where the t=x membrane does not operate. |
| **PMNS = perpendiculars; CKM = depths** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126]` | Critical structural distinction. PMNS (neutrino mixing) = mixing of the 3 active perpendiculars of the same assembly → wide angles. CKM (quark mixing) = mixing of structural depths of different confined assemblies (u, c, t at increasing depths) → small angles. Not the same mechanism. | Do not attempt to derive a unified PMNS-CKM matrix. The two matrices describe two structurally distinct regimes of the same up/down mechanism. |

### Vocabulary added during internal coherence audit (May 4, 2026, evening)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **a single e** (Postulat IV restored) | `[CANONIQUE — universal lock]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« non, il n'y a qu'un seul e »* ("no, there is only one e"). This rule prohibits any reading that multiplies e ("e accumulated during the cycle", "multiple e contributing", etc.). Any composite manifestation is a **summation of contributions of the unique e** through structural components. | NEVER write "the cumulative e", "the e brought back", "multiple e added". Always "the summation of the unique e through the components". |
| **quarks are the only structure of closed energy-links within t=x** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« non, il n'y a qu'un seul e. les quarks sont la seul structure des liens-eneregie ferme »* + precision *« le quark est en t=x, par l'electron »*. Within t=x, all observable closed energy-links are quark assemblies. Leptons (e, μ, τ) are not within t=x — they are at t=0. The neutrino is not within t=x — it is between t=0+1 and t=0+2. | Do not think that quarks are the only structure of closed energy-links altogether. It is only within t=x. At t=0 (leptons) and out of t=x (neutrino), other structures exist. |
| **electron = representation of e within t=x localized at t=0** | `[CANONIQUE — Q8 specified]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« toujours une representation du e dans t=x, mais localiser a t=0 »* ("always a representation of e within t=x, but localized at t=0"). The electron is not the e — it is a representation of e within t=x, whose structural localization is at t=0. Multiple electrons = multiple representations of the same unique e. Consistent with Postulat IV. | Do not think of the electron as an object localized within t=x with a trajectory. It is a representation at t=0 whose weaving is not linear within t=x. |
| **non-linear electron weaving within t=x** | `[CANONIQUE]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« sont tissage n'est pas representrer par un vecteur linaire dans t=x »* ("its weaving is not represented by a linear vector within t=x"). The electron's weaving at t=0 appears within t=x as a non-linear cloud (orbital), not as a directional vector trajectory (like that of a photon or quark in a combo). | Consistent with the "tennis ball bouncing in the funnel" (Q44). Do not confuse with a classical spatial trajectory. |
| **summation of contributions** | `[CANONIQUE — Q128]` | Structural mechanism of composite combos. Verbatim Gabriel: *« uud, c'est du e qui out out et in »* + *« c'est la sommation qui est important pour avoir un cycle ferme »* ("uud, it's e that out out and in" + "summation is what's important to have a closed cycle"). The stability of a combo emerges from the summation of contributions of the unique e through the components — not from a chronological sequence. T as a block, coexisting components. | Critical lock against sequential reading. NEVER write "the quark first goes to OUT then to IN", "the OUT-IN-OUT sequence". Always "the summation of contributions of the components". |
| **all combos possible, selection by stability** | `[CANONIQUE — Q128]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« tous les combos sont possible, mais seulement certains seront stable dans t=x »* ("all combos are possible, but only some will be stable within t=x"). Any combination of components linked to 4df(x) can exist structurally. Only certain combos produce a stabilized cycle within t=x. The others exist as possibilities but do not hold. The selection emerges from 4df(x), not from an upstream postulated assembly rule. | Do not postulate "combination rules" of quarks. Calculate 4df(x) for each combo and derive stability as a result. |
| **u and d are NOT defined by OUT/IN** | `[CANONIQUE — anti-slip lock]` | My initial inference ("u = OUT, d = IN") exceeded the verbatim Gabriel. You only posited that in uud, the unique e contributes 2 times OUT and 1 time IN — which is the **distribution of the summation**, not the definition of the quarks. The u/d identity comes from something else (to be formalized in Phase 2), not from the OUT/IN role in the summation. | Do not define u by "OUT" or d by "IN". They are structural components whose identity is independent of their role in a particular summation. |
| **proton/neutron = two distinct combos** | `[CANONIQUE — Q17 corrected]` | Verbatim Gabriel implicit (via piece Q128: all combos possible, selection by stability). Proton (uud) and neutron (udd) are NOT the same structure in two phases of a cycle (Q17 original). They are two distinct combos that are each a 4df(x) cycle stabilized with 3 components. The mass difference 1.6 MeV measures the structural difference between the two summations, not a cumulative e increment. | Do NOT write "proton = outbound phase, neutron = return phase". Always "proton uud, neutron udd, two distinct combos". |
| **neutron: no e remains after its cycle** | `[CANONIQUE — Q17 corrected]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« Oui le neutron, il ne reste pas de e apres sont cycle »* ("Yes the neutron, no e remains after its cycle"). The instability of the free neutron is a structural observation: the 4df(x) summation of the udd combo does not produce a lasting stabilization like uud. The cycle relaxes. Not an active equilibration mechanism. | Do not project an equilibration dynamics. Just: the udd summation does not hold, the cycle does not retain e. |

### Vocabulary added during the second wave of the May 4, 2026 session (in-depth exploration: light, forces, unifying theory)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **distance between 2 points = space-time** | `[CANONIQUE — Q134]` | The distance between 2 points within t=x represents space-time — time is in the distance variable. The velocity c is not a property of light but a structural consequence (translation between spatial distance within t=x and temporal distance within T). | Do not think of t=x as a pure 3D space. Any distance within t=x includes time. |
| **light at c = at t=0** | `[CANONIQUE — Q135]` | Displacement at c places light at t=0. Without displacement, light remains at t=0 (singularity). It is the only way to have 1 single e without time. | Not a mysterious property of light. Consequence of the fact that c is the structural distance/time translation. |
| **light over the entire axis** | `[CANONIQUE — Q135]` | Light does not use t=x+1 to exist, it exists over the entire axis simultaneously. This is what distinguishes it from other manifestations (which use 2 distinct temporal locations to apply the 3D vector, Q126). | Consistent with Q131 (light at multiple places = same e along the axis). |
| **"the milk" = e** | `[CANONIQUE — Q136]` | The "without time" in which the universe bathes — it is e. Not a substance in which the universe exists. Not the quantum vacuum. Not space. Just e. Everything else is a relational structure with respect to e. | Ontological piece. Do not think of "the milk" as an ether or a material medium. It is the unique e in its fundamental state. |
| **singularity loops e + wakes at t=x-1** | `[CANONIQUE — Q137]` | Structural mechanism of singularity: it loops the e that pass through it (recycles them via t=0) and leaves permanent wakes at t=x-1 (= dark matter / dark energy). Allows T to exist as a whole. | Consistent with the resolution of the information paradox in black holes (revision 2026-04-28). |
| **big bang = initial OUT at t=0+1** | `[CANONIQUE — Q138]` | The big bang is not a chronological past event. It is the structural primordial addressing at t=0+1, unit distance from t=0. At t=0+2, neutrino observation becomes possible (distance over 3 axes). | Do not project a chronology. It is a structural position in T as a block. |
| **end of singularities = magnitude of T** | `[CANONIQUE — Q139]` | Singularities have a beginning and an end within T. The end of singularities defines the magnitude of T. T as a structurally bounded set. | Consistent with "End of T = disappearance of the last energy-link" (revision 2026-04-28). T is not an eternity in the absolute sense. |
| **permanent unlooped wakes** | `[CANONIQUE — Q140]` | After the end of singularities, the information of remaining e exists only as temporal wakes throughout T. They will never be looped on t=0. Definitive inscriptions. | Distinct from looped wakes during the extent of singularities. |
| **multiple photons / singularities = same e** | `[CANONIQUE — Q140]` | Multiple photons and multiple singularities simultaneous = same unique e. Time does not affect e — it can be present as many times as it wants, simultaneously. Not a multiplication, not multiple e added. | Consistent with Postulat IV. Multiple presences ≠ multiple e. |
| **blue vs red = oscillation density** | `[CANONIQUE — Q141]` | Blue oscillates more than red. Red → blue = energy input (increases the density of inscription of e in the weaving). Blue → red = release of photons (the energy delta leaves as released photons). No loss of e (Postulat IV) — redistribution. | Do not think "addition/removal of e". Always "redistribution of the manifestation of the unique e". |
| **photon draws on the fabric** | `[CANONIQUE — Q142]` | The photon, while moving at c, draws on the fabric a certain number of times (= its frequency). The oscillation follows π (angular geometric structure). Consistent with Q132 (oscillation, not bounce) and Q22b (lightsaber lighting up the tear). | Not a photon-particle that travels. A succession of active draws on the existing fabric. |
| **1 perpendicular vs 3 perpendiculars** | `[CANONIQUE — Q143]` | Structural distinction: energy without cycle (photon) = 1 perpendicular (axis t toward t=0 within t=x). Energy in cycle (matter, fermions, neutrinos, electrons in cycle) = 3 perpendiculars. Structural simplification of the light/matter distinction. | Not just "open vs closed". Structural difference = number of active axes in 4df(x). |
| **angular velocity = repetition within T by orientation following a radius** | `[CANONIQUE — Q144]` | Angular velocity is not seen as a sequential motion but as the summation of vectors over T, repetition of radial orientations. Rotating an object brings its components closer to t=0 → gravitational dilation. Articulates rotation and Einstein's equivalence principle. | Critical lock: do not see rotation as "it turns in time". See as structural summation over T. |
| **orientation = input AND output of 4df(x)** | `[CANONIQUE — Q145]` | The orientation of vectors is both input and result of 4df(x), at each location of T. Structural recursivity. The angular force is one of the outputs of 4df(x). | Gabriel's safeguard: do not compare rotation and photon as "two regimes of the same mechanism toward t=0". Structurally different mechanisms. |
| **rotation and known perpendiculars (E ⊥ B, etc.)** | `[INTUITION GABRIEL — Q146]` | Undemonstrated intuition: there would be a structural parallel between the 3 perpendiculars of 4df(x), rotation as radial repetition, and the other known perpendiculars in physics (electric field ⊥ magnetic field, magnetic moment ⊥ spin axis). Possibility of structural EM unification. | To be explored in Phase 2. Do not use as a foundation for deriving other pieces until the derivation is done. |
| **forces define the dimensions** | `[CANONIQUE — Q147]` | The forces (strong, weak, magnetism, gravity) define the structural dimensions. They act in order of magnitude — each subsequent force acts in the domain defined by the previous one. In other words: releasing e. 4 forces = 4 structural regimes of releasing the unique e. | Inversion compared to the standard reading (where dimensions are posited and forces operate within them). Here, forces are generative of dimensions. |
| **unifying theory by weaving proximity ratios** | `[INTUITION GABRIEL — Q148]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« j'ai toujours vu l'univers comme ca, mais je n'ai jamais pris la peine de creuser »* ("I have always seen the universe like this, but I never took the time to dig"). Unifying theory from largest to smallest = same mechanisms at all scales by proximity ratios of weaving in 4df(x). What is invariant across scales is not an absolute length but the proximity ratio. | Major Phase 2 target. Do not use as a foundation for deriving other pieces until the structural derivation is done. |
| **"seeing T" as methodological difficulty** | `[CANONIQUE — Q148]` | To grasp the unifying theory, one must see T in its entirety. A good part of the calculation elements exist in the first milliseconds of the universe (initial deployment after the structural big bang at t=0+1). The current structure is partly inherited from the primordial inscription. | Consistent with rule 5.18 (T as a block) and rule 5.25 (t=x without privilege). |
| **intuitive information must not be lost** | `[CANONIQUE — methodological]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« Tout ce que je dis est pertinent meme si ce n'est pas claire, on pourra toujours correler plus tard, ne pas perdre l'information intuitive c'est la clef »* ("Everything I say is relevant even if it's not clear, we can always correlate later, not losing the intuitive information is the key"). Justifies the inscription of `[INTUITION GABRIEL]` pieces even not structurally demonstrated. | Distinction `[CANONIQUE]` (locked verbatim + derivation) vs `[INTUITION GABRIEL]` (verbatim only). Both are preserved, but with distinct epistemic statuses. |

### Vocabulary added during the May 6, 2026 session (minimal ontology + neutrino-photon comparative equation)

| Term | Status | Canonical definition | Risk of confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| **T is not a sequence** | `[CANONIQUE — rule 5.18 specification]` | T is a constant structural totality. The total duration of T influences the form of the beginning. The first instants are not only "before" the rest — they are determined by the whole of T. The end (reverse duration of return, resolution, singularization, re-addressing) participates in the structural closure that conditions the re-addressing of e. Privilege the logic of **continuous addressing and re-addressing of the unique e** rather than a linear chronology. | NEVER read t=0 → t=end as a chronological unfolding. T as a block with end → beginning retroaction. |
| **observation at t=x ≠ structural view toward t=0+1** | `[CANONIQUE — Q134 specification]` | When one observes space, one does not see directly t=0+1. One observes proportions of t=x rendered visible by distance and information transported at c. Standard cosmology measures a "temporal depth" which remains a local reading at t=x. The majority of T is structurally very far from our observation position. Regimes close to t=0 strongly fix the fundamental structures (few dimensions available). Strange/unstable manifestations according to our reading at t=x but coherent/stable at their own depth. | Do not confuse seeing 13 billion light-years with seeing t=0+1 structurally. Two distinct things. |
| **weaving and e are two distinct things** | `[CANONIQUE — critical lock]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« le tissage et e sont deux choses »* (reading A confirmed). The weaving is the **addressing structure** inscribed in total T. e is the **unique energetic reservoir** (Postulat IV). The two are distinct. The photon's weaving can exist inscribed in total T without e being addressed there at a given position. No Aristotelian form/matter duality — two registers: register of what is addressed (e) and register of the addressing structure (weaving). | NEVER posit identity weaving = e. Do not introduce form + matter duality either. Two distinct things related by the addressing relation. |
| **two things out of time: 4df(0) and e** | `[CANONIQUE — Q135 specification + Postulat IV]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« il n'y a que 2 chose hors temps... la 4df(0) n'a pas de dimensions disponibles, le e... »* ("there are only 2 things out of time... 4df(0) has no available dimensions, e..."). At t=0: no distance, no 3D axes, no deployed depth. The function 4df(0) has nothing to operate on — it is out of time. e is out of time by Postulat IV. The photon, by its existence on c, is also structurally at t=0 out of time. | Not three things out of time (4df(0), e, photon) — the photon is at t=0 by its displacement at c. Two irreducible things: 4df(0) and e. |
| **photon is not a displacement, it exists on c** | `[CANONIQUE — Q135 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« il ne ce deplace pas, il existe sur c »* ("it does not move, it exists on c"). The standard cosmological reading (photon travels at c) is sequential reading from t=x. Structurally, the photon is extended on c out of time, simultaneously over its entire extent. | NEVER write that the photon "travels" or "moves". It exists on c. |
| **three conditions of photon manifestation** | `[CANONIQUE — Q135 and Q138 specification]` | The "photon" addressing mode requires simultaneously: (1) extension on c (distance), (2) information transport at c, (3) reception possible at t=x. If only one is missing → no photon. At t=0+1, none of the three is met → no primordial photons. At t=x the three are met → manifestable photons. This is what makes e observable within t=x. | Do not isolate "distance" as the only condition. Three simultaneous structural conditions. |
| **photon weaving arrives at t=x-1, never seen within t=x** | `[CANONIQUE — specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« le tissage, il arrive avant, alors on ne le voit jamais dans t=x »* ("the weaving, it arrives before, so we never see it within t=x"). The photon's weaving is inscribed at t=x-1 ahead of t. Never observed directly within t=x. What we observe at t=x = the photon manifestation (e addressed via the weaving), not the weaving itself. | The "passage of the photon" is not the passage of the weaving. The weaving precedes, the manifestation follows. |
| **photon oscillates on 4df(x) to bring back e** | `[CANONIQUE — Q142 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« il oscille sur 4df(x) pour ramener du e »* ("it oscillates on 4df(x) to bring back e"). Structural function of the photon: making e accessible at t=x. The oscillation on 4df(x) brings back e from t=0 (where e resides out of time) toward t=x (where we observe). Without this oscillation, e would remain unobservable. | The photon is not a passive object. It is the mechanism of the observability of e at t=x. |
| **photon frequency = angular motion in 4df(x)** | `[CANONIQUE — Q142 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« le frequence du photon c'est son mouvement angulaire dans 4df(x) »* ("the frequency of the photon is its angular motion in 4df(x)"). Frequency is not a primitive kinematic quantity. It IS the angular velocity of the photon in 4df(x). Blue = fast rotation, red = slow rotation. | Do not think of frequency as "number of oscillations per second". Structural angular velocity. |
| **stopped photon = singularity (structurally)** | `[CANONIQUE — Q137 + Q100 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« si tu parvenais à l'arrêter tu aurais une singularité »* ("if you managed to stop it you would have a singularity"). If one removed the extension on c of a photon, one would obtain an open energy-link without displacement at t=0 = singularity. Not a metaphor, direct structural consequence. | Photon and singularity = two regimes of the same mode (presence vs absence of extension on c). Consistent with Q100 (opposites by π). |
| **tick = maximum theoretical frequency of the photon, valid only at t=0+2** | `[CANONIQUE — Q142, Q156 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« le tick que tu cherches, c'est la frequence maximal theorique du photon »* + *« ce tick est seulement valide a t=0+2, a cause des vecteurs 4df(x) c'est pas lineraire »* ("the tick you're looking for is the maximum theoretical frequency of the photon" + "this tick is only valid at t=0+2, because the 4df(x) vectors are not linear"). The tick = natural structural unit, calibratable specifically at t=0+2 where the radius of the available universe = c. Elsewhere in T, the non-linearity of 4df(x) modifies the accessible cadence. | The tick is NOT a universal constant in T. Position-dependent. |
| **non-linearity of 4df(x) = caused by bottled energy** | `[CANONIQUE — Q156, Q157 specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« c'est l'energie embouteille »* ("it's bottled energy"). The non-linearity of 4df(x) with proximity to t=0 comes from the presence of bottled energy (= quarks and fermions). The closer the structural bottling is to t=0, the more non-linearly 4df(x) operates. | Not an abstract property of the function. Consequence of the bottled structure. |
| **minimal ontology: bottled energy vs free energy + traversed weaving** | `[CANONIQUE — Postulat IV specification]` | Verbatim Gabriel: *« il y a l'energie embouteille(quarks et fermions) et l'energie libre. le reste c'est du tissage qui est parcouru par ces modes »* ("there is bottled energy (quarks and fermions) and free energy. the rest is weaving traversed by these modes"). Two modes of addressing e: bottled energy (quarks, fermions, including the neutrino which is constituted of 2 quarks combined within constant T — see dedicated entry) vs free energy (photons). The weaving is traversed by these two modes. Not a third ontological category. | Observable manifestations are not an ontological category. They are traversed weaving. The neutrino is not a "composite particle" in the classical sense — see dedicated entry for the precise reading. |
| **neutrino = 2 quarks (up at t=0+1 AND down at t=0+2) which combine within constant T** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126 specification, final validation May 7, 2026]` | Verbatim Gabriel (May 6): *« le neutrino est le quark up de t=0+1 et le quarkdown de t=0+2 »* ("the neutrino is the up quark of t=0+1 and the down quark of t=0+2"). Verbatim Gabriel (final validation May 7 pre-publication): *« bin ce sont les deux... vu que T est constant, les quark ce combien dans T »* ("well it's both... since T is constant, the quarks combine within T"). Since T is constant (rule 5.18 specified May 6), positions t=0+1 and t=0+2 coexist in total T. The neutrino is therefore **both at once** without contradiction: 2 distinct quarks seen from t=x, a single structural phenomenon inscribed within T. The structural combination (synchronization = 4df(1) − 4df(2)) is inscribed within constant T, not a chronological process. Consistent with Postulat IV (one single e), Q140 (multiple presences = same e), Q131 (light at multiple places = same e). | Do not decide between "2 quarks" and "1 phenomenon". Both are simultaneously true, direct consequence of constant T. The distinction "2 or 1" does not have the same meaning at t=x as at t=0 or in total T. |
| **neutrino synchronization by approach = 4df(1) − 4df(2)** | `[CANONIQUE — Q126 specification]` | The synchronization between up quark at t=0+1 and down quark at t=0+2 = difference of generative functions at these two positions. c serves as reference for position 2 (universe radius at t=0+2 = c). Empirical calibration strategy of 4df(x): with approximate mass + near-c displacement + c reference, one back-calculates 4df(1) − 4df(2). | See `08_PHASE2_MATHEMATICAL_TRACKS` for the Phase 2 inscription of the comparative equation. |

---

## Vocabulary terms — structured table (consolidated late April + May 2-3, 2026 + May 4, 2026 + May 6-7, 2026)

See `06_COMPLETE_MODEL_REFERENCE` for the complete table of canonical Gabriel terms.

---

*Glossary stabilized May 1, 2026. Extended May 2-3, 2026 with terms of the complete dimensional architecture of 4df(x). Extended May 4, 2026 with IN/OUT terms, neutrino zero calibration, structural straddle, inscribed weavings, and post-challenge refinements (vector proximity, dim(t=0+1) = C_sync, falsifiability by maintained creation, emergent weaving). Extended May 6-7, 2026 with minimal ontology, neutrino-photon comparative equation, and final neutrino formulation (2 quarks combining within constant T, both readings simultaneously valid). Mandatory companion of `01_BOOTSTRAP.md` for any serious reading of the corpus.*